Page 8 - Randy Elf News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Four times in recent decades, Congress has at least started down the presidential-impeachment path. For some, each episode has been at least substantially, if not primarily, about politics – sometimes partisan politics – not law. For example, after President Trump’s 2021 acquittal, U.S. Rep. and lead House impeachment manager Jamie Raskin, D-Md., said, “We successfully prosecuted him in the court of public opinion and in the court of history.” Is this going to stop, or is this going to keep escalating? Enough already. The American people deserve better. Readers of this column these ...

Let’s pick up where we left off last week. Looking ahead — beyond the 2020 presidential election — includes fully reviewing illegalities in the 2020 election, regardless of whether they changed the result, plus carefully and fairly restoring the rule of law to American elections, all with an eye toward preventing future illegalities no matter whom they’d benefit. One step in such review and restoration can take place when the U.S. Supreme Court considers particular Pennsylvania law. The high court may decide soon whether to hear two such challenges. Neither can undo the 2020 election,...

Texas filed the second challenge, asserting claims against Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. Although the high court declined to accept the challenge, because Texas lacks standing to bring such a challenge against another state, other challenges remain. Other challengers don’t have Texas’s problem with standing. Texas’s complaint in effect blazes a trail of arguments – not the only trail, mind you – that others can raise in the high court. Paragraph 7 succinctly explains some of the extensive evidence of election fraud in the four defendant states: ¯ “Dozens of wi...

Texas filed the second challenge, asserting claims against Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. Although the high court declined to accept the challenge, because Texas lacks standing to bring such a challenge against another state, other challenges remain. Other challengers don’t have Texas’s problem with standing. Texas’s complaint in effect blazes a trail of arguments — not the only trail, mind you — that others can raise in the high court. Paragraph 7 succinctly explains some of the extensive evidence of election fraud in the four defendant states: ¯ “Dozens of wi...