Ten minutes after the attack was reported this morning and crews on atvs alerted hikers to leave the park. So here is whats next. Right now several teams are out looking for this Mountain Lion in the park. Specially trained dogs are on their way here. Now, the plan is that these dogs are going to try to treat this Mountain Lion. Theyre going to take a sample of that Mountain Lion after they shoot it with a tranquilizer gun. They will match that dna sample with a dna sample taken from the sixyearold girls wound. If there is a match, the department of fish and wildlife will make the call on what too do on that Mountain Lion. If it is the wrong one, it will be released several days later. This could go on into the night looking for this Mountain Lion with the dogs hoping to tree it. We do want to let you know that Rancho San Antonio has been closed since 10 00 a. M. This morning. There is no time or day when they will reopen the park. Theyre still looking for that Mountain Lion today. It
Please make sure to silence all cell phones on electronic devices. Replace speaker cards and any documents to be submitted to the clerk. [reading notes] item number 1, 180777, ordinane amending the planning code to require a conditional use authorization for employee cafeterias, as defined, within office space, except for existing employee cafeterias; affirming the planning departments determination under the California Environmental quality act; making findings of consistency with the general plan and the eight priority policies of planning code, section 101. 1; and adopting findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare under planning code, section 302. We had to make some amendments i had to set for one week. Anything you would like to add about this legislation . Clerk just to reiterate that we were to considerable amount of time with all of the stakeholders in i feel like weve got most i think we are in good shape. It is an honor to be your cosponsor. Does mr. Sanchez, not
Clerk. [reading notes] item number 1, 180777, ordinane amending the planning code to require a conditional use authorization for employee cafeterias, as defined, within office space, except for existing employee cafeterias; affirming the planning departments determination under the California Environmental quality act; making findings of consistency with the general plan and the eight priority policies of planning code, section 101. 1; and adopting findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare under planning code, section 302. We had to make some amendments i had to set for one week. Anything you would like to add about this legislation . Clerk just to reiterate that we were to considerable amount of time with all of the stakeholders in i feel like weve got most i think we are in good shape. It is an honor to be your cosponsor. Does mr. Sanchez, nothing from planning, is there any Public Comments on item number one . Seeing none. Public comment is closed. If there is no object
Okay, there is no fine for this. Do they have to run the title . Please make sure to silence all cell phones on electronic devices. Replace speaker cards and any documents to be submitted to the clerk. [reading notes] item number 1, 180777, ordinane amending the planning code to require a conditional use authorization for employee cafeterias, as defined, within office space, except for existing employee cafeterias; affirming the planning departments determination under the California Environmental quality act; making findings of consistency with the general plan and the eight priority policies of planning code, section 101. 1; and adopting findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare under planning code, section 302. We had to make some amendments i had to set for one week. Anything you would like to add about this legislation . Clerk just to reiterate that we were to considerable amount of time with all of the stakeholders in i feel like weve got most i think we are in good
Going to happen here and its a terrible thing. Im not under im not trying to diminish the importance, but the worst Case Scenario would be after all these hearings are over and the c. U. Is approved but a variance is denied, that the permit holder sometime, probably in the beginning of 2021, because thats how long its going to take, is going to have to cutoff 5 feet of the house and go back to go back to what the original program was. The Planning Commission would have the ability to make other modifications to the project. They could reduce the height of it, they could reduce the extension. Im hesitant to give that information to the appellant because the commission can and has in other cases, you know, had them go back to what was there before. In this case, i think what at least weighs in their favor is what was there before was a legal noncomplying structure. It has a garage at the front i mean, generally planning principles would be to have something towards the front of the prope