Just that, frightening. we need to honor that and recognize and empower those law enforcement officers which is precisely the opposite of the radical dangerous proposals we re seeing right now to defund them. a government of, by, and for the people must be a nation of law and order. and public safety, of course, is the key to maintaining our republic. calls to defund the police at the local level were simply saying to take the budgets of police departments and rethink them and remove some of the money and put it toward other ways to deal with mental health crises. public safety. public safety. it wasn t about not having the police get paid. they re saying we actually want to defund these agencies. what would happen to the country if they did that? i was here for that nonsense set of arguments. you know how they weaponized that in the election cycles in 2020, 2022, scaring my constituents, saying do you want to defund the police? of course not, i want to make sure the police are properly resourced and make sure that mental health is addressed, drug
The day-to-day brutalities of war combat is nothing but how long are greatly i m lucky. here. as their numbers dwindle, the stories of these remaining veterans are more important than ever. do you ever worry that the sacrifices made by the men who stormed the beaches at norman de, that maybe ultimately, there ll be for naught that ultimately this experiment will fail anyone who bets against america has taken a bad bet as the bottom line. that means that democracy, which is not a spectator sport he, to all of us to roll up our sleeves and be better citizens of this republic it just sense of responsibility for this experiment and its survival none of what our service members fought for and fight for is a given the american experiment democracy of buying
Than once the people of the united states have entrusted to the present congress in some sense the care of the republic not only for the present but for all here after. your committee, sir, would not assent to this house for its consideration this proposition this proposed amendment, the 14th. but for the conviction its adoption by congress and its ratification by the people of the united states is essential for the safety of all the people of every state. i repelled the suggested made here on the reconstruction any of its members favor the proposition seek in any form tomorrow the constitution of the country or take away from any state any right that belongs to or from any citizen of every state, any right that belongs to him under the constitution. proposition painted before the e house is simply a proposition to arm the congress of the united states by the consent of the people of the united states through the ratification process.
United states have entrusted to the present congress in some sense the care of the republic not only for the present but for all here after. your committee, sir, would not assent to this house for its consideration this proposition this proposed amendment, the 14th. but for the conviction its adoption by congress and its ratification by the people of the united states is essential for the safety of all the people of every state. i repelled the suggested made here on the reconstruction any of its members favor the proposition seek in any form tomorrow the constitution of the country or take away from any state any right that belongs to or from any citizen of every state, any right that belongs to him under the constitution. proposition painted before the e house is simply a proposition to arm the congress of the united states by the consent of the people of the united states through the ratification process.
Many of them purs person they ae deeply concerned. now, or the critics out there one who covers the court with me part of the supreme court press corps wrote this he said fascinating to hear the gop speaker and has admitted to having private conversations with multiple justices who expressed concern to him about trump s conviction but i m sure those justices will recuse them and eventual appeal to avoid sitting on a case they prejudged i did not take your comments mean that specific conversation but i want to give you a chance to clarify. no, think of course i ve not had conversations with the justices spread know their character, their personality. note that said in the past with a deeply concerned as we are about maintaining system of justice. chiseled on the marble above the front doors equal justice under law. they are concerned about maintaining that idea paid we all are it s a necessary ingredient to keep a constitutional republic that is what i was referring to. i think they are concerned about using court rooms for politics