Page 5 - Split Decisions News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Map since then, i suspect that if she's forced to make that vote again in 2025 january, she will vote with the constitution again, whereas i'm not so sure her primary challenger would. >> is that as that what voters are concerned about? >> that's the whole point. >> but, look, i do think at the end of the day defending democracy should be something that united states us. obviously it doesn't, but if you're a constitutional conservative, you should be supporting, you know, the constitution. i think margaret does lay out the broader stakes exactly right. 100 republicans who won primary votes bac...

The verdict is in: Fred Piscop’s new puzzle is a tough one.

There is no -- there are no hearings for supreme court nominees until that party has total control of the white house and the senate. what does that mean? it means potentially, if you think this through, let's say, god forbid, some of these justices are quite old, there's a health incident next year and mcconnell is majority leader and he says, sorry, my new standard is whatever way he reasons it, we're not holding hearings. therefore you have an eight-person court indefinitely. indefinitely. you could have split decisions on all kinds of weighty issues for this country. it is actually, in my ...

Democratic senators tripled down on their opposition to senate changes that would be neededs to pass the bill. first the u.s. supreme court and what the decision means for the president and the nation. fox news chief legal correspondent and anchor of fox news at night shannon bream joins us now. good evening, shannon. >> hello, bret, in that pair of split decisions the supreme court handed the biden administration both a major loss and a smaller victory. in blocking a workplace vaccine mandate that would have impacted more than 80 million american workers 6-3. supreme court held when it comes ...

In the majority opinion upholds his signature piece of legislation. do you find that as ironic as i do? >> no, because it's been the case for a lot of our justices on the court. i mean, even if you look over the past week, even in the split decisions, you know, the expectation from a lot of people who don't follow the supreme court is that they must be coming out with these decisions based off of ideological lines. you have six justices of the nine that were nominated by republican presidents, and a lot of people assumed that the decisions coming out are going to break 6-3 along those lines. i...