Live Breaking News & Updates on The first amendment

Stay informed with the latest breaking news from The first amendment on our comprehensive webpage. Get up-to-the-minute updates on local events, politics, business, entertainment, and more. Our dedicated team of journalists delivers timely and reliable news, ensuring you're always in the know. Discover firsthand accounts, expert analysis, and exclusive interviews, all in one convenient destination. Don't miss a beat — visit our webpage for real-time breaking news in The first amendment and stay connected to the pulse of your community

The Context

it's the advice of counsel. where are the lines? because this is what the case will ultimately come down to, the advice that people likejohn eastman and some of the others were giving him, regarding the election. if they were giving him knowingly false advice, was that covered by the first amendment? so false advice, was that covered by the first amendment?— the first amendment? so the strongest _ the first amendment? so the strongest case _ the first amendment? so the strongest case here - the first amendment? so the strongest case here would i the first amendment? so the i strongest case here would have the first amendment? so the - strongest case here would have been if prosecutors could have brought the argument that donald trump willfully— the argument that donald trump willfully incited violence on january— willfully incited violence on january six, because there was no first oer— january six, because there was no first peramendment january six, because there was no first per amendment production, no free—speech protection if you incite violence _ free—speech protection if you incite violence. but they didn't do that, which _ violence. but they didn't do that, which means i have to think they don't _ which means i have to think they don't have — which means i have to think they don't have the evidence. i think it would _ don't have the evidence. i think it would have — don't have the evidence. i think it would have liked to do that, but he was not _ would have liked to do that, but he was not charged with inciting violence. _ was not charged with inciting violence, norwas was not charged with inciting violence, nor was he linked to any of the _ violence, nor was he linked to any of the hundreds of cases that were prosecuted up here in washington, dc regarding _ prosecuted up here in washington, dc

Public-school-case , Some , Advice , Likejohn-eastman , Counsel , Others , Lines , Election , Amendment , Say-donald-trump , Argument- , Young-thug-case

BBC News at Ten

prosecution's strategy is going to be here, jack smith's team here says there is proof that the former president knew he was lying and launched a criminal conspiracy. you think after having read the indictment of the evidence laid out supports that? i indictment of the evidence laid out supports that?— supports that? i think this is a masterpiece _ supports that? i think this is a masterpiece in _ supports that? i think this is a masterpiece in terms - supports that? i think this is a masterpiece in terms of - supports that? i think this is a - masterpiece in terms of indictments. and it _ masterpiece in terms of indictments. and it really— masterpiece in terms of indictments. and it really lays _ masterpiece in terms of indictments. and it really lays out _ masterpiece in terms of indictments. and it really lays out well. _ masterpiece in terms of indictments. and it really lays out well. i- masterpiece in terms of indictments. and it really lays out well. i think - and it really lays out well. i think there _ and it really lays out well. i think there is— and it really lays out well. i think there is an — and it really lays out well. i think there is an awful— and it really lays out well. i think there is an awful lot _ and it really lays out well. i think there is an awful lot in _ and it really lays out well. i think there is an awful lot in there - and it really lays out well. i think there is an awful lot in there thatj there is an awful lot in there that proves— there is an awful lot in there that proves his — there is an awful lot in there that proves his participation— there is an awful lot in there that proves his participation in- there is an awful lot in there that proves his participation in these. proves his participation in these conspiracies. _ proves his participation in these conspiracies. a _ proves his participation in these conspiracies, a lot— proves his participation in these conspiracies, a lot of— proves his participation in these conspiracies, a lot of it - proves his participation in these conspiracies, a lot of it proves. proves his participation in these i conspiracies, a lot of it proves his criminal— conspiracies, a lot of it proves his criminal intent, _ conspiracies, a lot of it proves his criminal intent, and _ conspiracies, a lot of it proves his criminal intent, and his _ conspiracies, a lot of it proves his i criminal intent, and his knowledge, particularly. — criminal intent, and his knowledge, particularly. for— criminal intent, and his knowledge, particularly, for instance, _ criminal intent, and his knowledge, particularly, for instance, that - criminal intent, and his knowledge, particularly, for instance, that the i particularly, for instance, that the election— particularly, for instance, that the election was — particularly, for instance, that the election was in _ particularly, for instance, that the election was in fact _ particularly, for instance, that the election was in fact lost _ particularly, for instance, that the election was in fact lost by - particularly, for instance, that the election was in fact lost by him, i election was in fact lost by him, that there — election was in fact lost by him, that there was _ election was in fact lost by him, that there was not _ election was in fact lost by him, that there was not sufficient - election was in fact lost by him, i that there was not sufficient fraud out there — that there was not sufficient fraud out there in— that there was not sufficient fraud out there in order— that there was not sufficient fraud out there in order to _ that there was not sufficient fraud out there in order to make - that there was not sufficient fraud out there in order to make the - out there in order to make the claims — out there in order to make the claims that— out there in order to make the claims that he _ out there in order to make the claims that he had, _ out there in order to make the claims that he had, that - out there in order to make the claims that he had, that his. claims that he had, that his statements— claims that he had, that his statements publicly- claims that he had, that his statements publicly while i claims that he had, that his- statements publicly while protected by the _ statements publicly while protected by the first — statements publicly while protected by the first amendment _ statements publicly while protected by the first amendment were - statements publicly while protected by the first amendment were not i by the first amendment were not supported — by the first amendment were not supported by— by the first amendment were not supported by the _ by the first amendment were not supported by the facts, _ by the first amendment were not supported by the facts, and - by the first amendment were not supported by the facts, and i- by the first amendment were notl supported by the facts, and i think that is— supported by the facts, and i think that is going — supported by the facts, and i think that is going to— supported by the facts, and i think that is going to be _ supported by the facts, and i think that is going to be a _ supported by the facts, and i think that is going to be a real— supported by the facts, and i think that is going to be a real dagger. that is going to be a real dagger for him — that is going to be a real dagger for him to— that is going to be a real dagger for him to deal— that is going to be a real dagger for him to deal with _ that is going to be a real dagger for him to deal with at - that is going to be a real dagger for him to deal with at trial. - for him to deal with at trial. sarah. _ for him to deal with at trial. sarah. we _ for him to deal with at trial. sarah, we saw— for him to deal with at trial. sarah, we saw the - for him to deal with at trial. sarah, we saw the former. for him to deal with at trial. - sarah, we saw the former attorney

President , Jack-smith , Indictment , Conspiracy , Strategy , Evidence , Proof , Team , Prosecution , Lot , It , Indictments

BBC News at Ten

they would expect to present at any trial in this matter.— trial in this matter. david, i want to net trial in this matter. david, i want to get your _ trial in this matter. david, i want to get your thoughts _ trial in this matter. david, i want to get your thoughts on - trial in this matter. david, i want to get your thoughts on that, - trial in this matter. david, i want i to get your thoughts on that, sorry we just cut you off there. trio. to get your thoughts on that, sorry we just cut you off there.— to get your thoughts on that, sorry we just cut you off there. no, i was 'ust aeoin we just cut you off there. no, i was just going to _ we just cut you off there. no, i was just going to say — we just cut you off there. no, i was just going to say it _ we just cut you off there. no, i was just going to say it is _ we just cut you off there. no, i was just going to say it is really - just going to say it is really jam-packed _ just going to say it is really jam—packed with _ just going to say it is really jam—packed with a - just going to say it is really jam—packed with a lot - just going to say it is really jam—packed with a lot of. jam—packed with a lot of information. _ jam—packed with a lot of information. you - jam—packed with a lot of information. you never. jam—packed with a lot of. information. you never put everything _ information. you never put everything having - information. you never put everything having the - information. you never put - everything having the indictments, but i everything having the indictments, but i think— everything having the indictments, but i think that _ everything having the indictments, but i think that what _ everything having the indictments, but i think that what jackson - everything having the indictments, but i think that what jackson did i but i think that what jackson did was a _ but i think that what jackson did was a couple _ but i think that what jackson did was a couple of _ but i think that what jackson did was a couple of things. - but i think that what jackson did was a couple of things. one, - but i think that what jackson did was a couple of things. one, in. but i think that what jackson did i was a couple of things. one, in an effort _ was a couple of things. one, in an effort to— was a couple of things. one, in an effort to be — was a couple of things. one, in an effort to be complete _ was a couple of things. one, in an effort to be complete transparentl effort to be complete transparent and educational, _ effort to be complete transparent and educational, he _ effort to be complete transparent and educational, he painted - effort to be complete transparent and educational, he painted outi effort to be complete transparent i and educational, he painted out the whole _ and educational, he painted out the whole story— and educational, he painted out the whole story and _ and educational, he painted out the whole story and it _ and educational, he painted out the whole story and it really _ and educational, he painted out the whole story and it really speaks - and educational, he painted out the whole story and it really speaks to i whole story and it really speaks to all the _ whole story and it really speaks to all the issues _ whole story and it really speaks to all the issues and _ whole story and it really speaks to all the issues and anticipates - whole story and it really speaks to all the issues and anticipates a - whole story and it really speaks to all the issues and anticipates a lotj all the issues and anticipates a lot of the _ all the issues and anticipates a lot of the defences, _ all the issues and anticipates a lot of the defences, such _ all the issues and anticipates a lot of the defences, such as - all the issues and anticipates a lot of the defences, such as the - all the issues and anticipates a lot of the defences, such as the first| of the defences, such as the first amendment. _ of the defences, such as the first amendment, such— of the defences, such as the first amendment, such as _ of the defences, such as the first amendment, such as the - of the defences, such as the first amendment, such as the advice. of the defences, such as the first. amendment, such as the advice of counsel— amendment, such as the advice of counsel and — amendment, such as the advice of counsel and so— amendment, such as the advice of counsel and so forth, _ amendment, such as the advice of counsel and so forth, and - amendment, such as the advice of counsel and so forth, and keep- amendment, such as the advice of counsel and so forth, and keep it i counsel and so forth, and keep it all that. — counsel and so forth, and keep it allthat. but— counsel and so forth, and keep it all that, but again _ counsel and so forth, and keep it all that, but again you _ counsel and so forth, and keep it all that, but again you never- counsel and so forth, and keep it all that, but again you never putl all that, but again you never put everything — all that, but again you never put everything you _ all that, but again you never put everything you know _ all that, but again you never put everything you know into - all that, but again you never put everything you know into the - everything you know into the indictment. _ everything you know into the indictment, he _ everything you know into the indictment, he put— everything you know into the indictment, he put an- everything you know into the indictment, he put an awful. everything you know into the i indictment, he put an awful lot. everything you know into the - indictment, he put an awful lot. i would expect— indictment, he put an awful lot. i would expect he _ indictment, he put an awful lot. i would expect he has— indictment, he put an awful lot. i would expect he has more. - indictment, he put an awful lot. i would expect he has more. bryan, i want to come _ would expect he has more. bryan, i want to come to _ would expect he has more. bryan, i want to come to you _ would expect he has more. bryan, i want to come to you now, - would expect he has more. bryan, i want to come to you now, i - would expect he has more. bryan, i want to come to you now, i found i want to come to you now, i found it interesting, a trump ally was big into nbc news, saying that it helps to have the former president facing more than one indictment, because if his one, all the focus is on the detail of that one case, if it is three, some of those details get

Lot , Set-trial , Thoughts , Matter-trial , Trial , Matter , David-kelley , Information , Trio , Ust-aeoin , Couple , One

Fox News Tonight

we go? >> the schoolgirl greta because she's always such a joy to watch and listen to. >> love her. very wise woman. that's all for tonight. thank you for watching jesse watters prime time, i'm kaylee. have a great night. >> good evening, america. i'm lawrence jones. so for the second day in a row, the left radical agenda took a major blow in the supreme court. president biden is throwing a fit after his student loan bailout got struck down, more on that in a minute but first, why the left lost today, the first amendment got a huge win. the supreme court ruled in favor of a colorado web designer named llori smith that a law that

All , Woman , Joy , Jesse-watters , Prime-time , Night , Kaylee , Joe-biden-isn-t , Lawrence-jones , Supreme-court , Blow , Left

What Elon Musk Doesn't Know About Free Speech

The First Amendment does not protect one’s right to have a social-media account, but today’s dissent has mostly moved online, and, as a result, is privately owned.

China , New-york , United-states , Americans , America , Matt-taibbi , Marjorie-taylor-greene , Joe-biden , Andrew-anglin , Elon-musk , Kathy-griffin , Hunter-biden

Obama and the Left Go After the First Amendment

Commentary Former President Barack Obama does not believe in free speech for his political adversaries. In a speech ...

Stanford-university , California , United-states , China , Ohio , The-white-house , District-of-columbia , Americans , America , Chinese , American , Stepheng-tallentyre

What critical race theory is -- and isn't


What critical race theory is -- and isn't
CNN
5 days ago
By Faith Karimi, CNN
© Olivier Douliery/AFP/Getty Images
Demonstrators deploy a " Black Lives Matter" banner near the White House during a demonstration against racism and police brutality, in Washington, DC on June 6, 2020. - Demonstrations are being held across the US following the death of George Floyd on May 25, 2020, while being arrested in Minneapolis, Minnesota. (Photo by Olivier DOULIERY / AFP) (Photo by OLIVIER DOULIERY/AFP via Getty Images)
Critical race theory. You may be hearing those three words a lot these days.
Lawmakers in Tennessee and Idaho have banned its teaching from their public schools' curriculum, while parents in Texas are opposing a school district's efforts to combat racism with lessons in "cultural awareness" -- seen by some as critical race theory.

New-york , United-states , Tennessee , North-carolina , Idaho , Texas , Washington , White-house , District-of-columbia , Minnesota , Wisconsin , Columbia-university

Fox hosts Dobbs, Bartiromo strike back in voting fraud suit

Fox hosts Dobbs, Bartiromo strike back in voting fraud suit
myjournalcourier.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from myjournalcourier.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.

New-york , United-states , Syracuse-university , Venezuela , Venezuelan , America , American , Lou-dobbs , Donald-trump , Bob-andres-atlanta , Rudolph-giuliani , J-erik-connolly