Live Breaking News & Updates on The Modern Supreme Court
Stay updated with breaking news from The modern supreme court. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
well, you re welcome, we the travel east point about taking the abstracting concretizing it, they re not thought experiments anymore, it s really humans lives and it s real peoples lives. i do think that public opinion is more on the side of common sense on these questions than the republican party s, and we ll see how that plays out. we will see, indeed, i m a sun studio, come back soon. i will. thanks for joining us this hour, tonight, as donald trump s former s vice president considers talking to the january 6th investigation, his former lawyer testifies before an atlanta grand jury, and his longtime cfo prepares to plead guilty in turn on the trump organization. despite the presidents considerable legal woes, he can t seem to find any qualified attorneys to represent him. oh speak to caroline, who joins us live. then we go down to florida, where republican governor ron desantis has given some new lessons for revisionist history, and christian nationalism. ....
qualified attorneys to represent him. carol lenning, who joins us live. then we go down to florida, where republican governor ron desantis has given some new lessons for revisionist history, and christian nationalism. new yorker writer, and dean of the jelani cobb will be in the studios to discuss, and president biden cancels promising jobs of the future, that never arrived. but we start tonight with mounting investigations into the former president of the united states. after last night s election in wyoming, donald trump appears poised to gain some allies in congress. but it comes as trump is quickly losing friends, basically everywhere else. today, trump s former president mike pence said he d consider talking to the january 6th committee. just this state on the january 6th, if they were to call you on the committee to come testify, would you be agreeable? if there is an invitation to participate, i consider it. any invitation to be directed to me, i d have ....
least six states already. omhouse republicans are pushing on legislation to ban abortion after 15 weeks nationwide. the united states is joining the ranks of nicar nicaragua, polan el salvador to roll back abortion rights. reporter: large crowd here at the united states supreme court, let s look around, i ll show you the vast majority, the people here at this time are abortion rights supporters. you can that by the proponents. we had verbal confrontations, cursing, what have you, but it has remained peaceful. still the folks here projecting a sense of anger, projecting almost shock if you will, and that s one of the things i m asking people about in the crowd here, given the fact there was so much advance warning that the court was headed in this direction, abortion rights opponents have been protesting, if you will, roe v. wade for 50 years and then just a few weeks ago, we got that advance opinion that leaked opinion of justice alito really signaling the court was h ....
And there was a strong focus on originalism in terms of understanding the constitution. and originalism is seen as the right way to interpret the constitution? by way of what we were taught, yes. [inaudible] yes. right, so this suggests the supreme court is going against the founders original vision, in engel v vitale, the ending of school prayer. that scene is moving away from the principles of america? there is a slide here, where he goes to talk about the ending of originalism. it s this one. interpreting the constitution. and who is that? scalia, justice scalia, who is probably the most notorious in the modern supreme court for being an originalist. yeah. and kind of the more conservative court here, they only mention ....
Christian household, they were very concerned, and very worried about what was happening, especially those with a lot of tenure in the field. and nobody could raise our hands and question this? no, if you ask the question, they used my favorite teacher strategy, which is essentially to say, that s wonderful, great. great topic of discussion, we will come back to that, and never come back to it. kind of hoping that they ll forget that they raise these questions. then there is what the trainings had to say about how the quotes should have to put the constitution, in the real world there is an ongoing debate between two fundamentally different methods of interpretation, on one side there s regionalism, the belief that the court should target the constitution by the way that the founding fathers wrote it in the 19th century. on the other side, the idea that the constitution is a document who s interpretation of all start the years, as american society itself state changes. ....