Well, im not going to bother. Woodruff all that and more, on tonights pbs newshour. Major funding for the pbs newshour has been provided by life welllived. Financial Services Firm raymond james. For 25 years, consumer cellulars goal has been to provide Wireless Service that helps people communicate and connect. We offer a variety of nocontract plans, and our u. S. Based Customer Service team can help find one that fits you. To learn more, visit www. Consumcellular. Tv. Johnson johnson. Bnsf railway. Fidelity wealth management. The john s. And james l. Knight foundation. Fostering informed and engaged communities. More at kf. Org. And with the ongoing support of these institutions and individuals. This program was made possible by the corporation for public broadcasting. And by contributions to your pbs station from viewers like you. Thank you. Woodruff President Trump is making new headlines tonight on covid19 this time, on the economic front. He ss he is halting negotiations with demo
The simplicity that america would be able to increase escalate when it wants them to bring it down so for example if the u. S. Drops bombs in pakistan to syria or in any other dozen countries understanding would be that country would not be allowed to respond because of the unpredictable and there are devastating consequences from your so they can bring tensions up and down as they want for pressure now whats interesting with iran is they more or less denied this is america cause what they did was they launched their missiles directly at American Military bases and america essentially have to suck it up and accept well this is the price we have to pay for for killing. General in the in iran so this is so that they rob americans of this escalation run their business its very interesting because diem if you look at the rainy in response why firing those missiles and just hitting buildings and store where houses and things like that its. But that is the message there is that they can do i
A very powerful country stretching around throwing bombs in some directions killing people in other directions threatening people with sanctions but it isnt coherent and you know. You wouldnt get that impression from Mainstream Media go ahead glenn go ahead and i was just going to say this theme of. Escalation dominance has been the very central strategic objects about do not a state so. The simplicity that america would be able to increase escalate when it wants and the bring it down so for example if the u. S. Drops bombs in pakistan to syria or in another dozen countries understanding would be that country would not be allowed to respond because of the unpredictable and there are devastating consequences from your so they can bring tensions up and down as they want for for pressure now whats interesting with iran is they more or less denied this is america cost what they did last. And launch their missiles directly at American Military bases and america essentially have to suck it u
Inside of iraq against the will of the people in government and parliament there that is what makes this all asymmetrical and i think you can draw different conclusions about as the media likes to do who won and who lost go ahead alex and well. Heres what i think the fundamental difference is that the iranians deployed the. Range of their assets together that that Foreign Policy that diplomats they bring to get their political leaders they be able to bring in their intelligence operatives manage me people also their economic assets such as they are and they set themselves very clear objectives which they dont let themselves be done 38. 00 from and that objective is not clearly defined easy is to try to get the United States and the middle east out of iraq specifically areas where they can threaten iran the. Knowledge states by contrast what we see there is a dysfunctional government which doesnt have any kind of clear long 6 long established plan so you have different people pushing fo
Different reasons taran was being strategic and political while trump was relying upon sanctions and the 3rd and and the demand that the United States be remain inside of iraq against the will of the people in government and parliament there that is what makes this all asymmetrical and i think you can draw different conclusions about as the media likes to do who won and who lost go ahead alex and well what is what i mean i think the fundamental difference is that the range to the strategic range of their asses to get that Foreign Policy that diplomats they bring to get their political aint is they be able to bring in their intelligence operatives manage to me people also their economic assets such as they are and they set themselves very clear objectives which they dont let themselves be done from. And then objective is not clearly defined easy is to try to get the United States out of the middle east out of iraq specifically out of areas where they can threaten new iraq iran the Unite