Live Breaking News & Updates on Wasn T Campaigning
Stay updated with breaking news from Wasn t campaigning. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
I m entitled to immunity. every president has immunity. especially one that did the job that i did. i did a great job. i wasn t working for myself. i was working for the country. i wasn t campaigning, the election was along over. i wasn t campaigning. i was looking for voter fraud. something that i have to do under my mandate, i have to look for voter fraud. so, now, according to donald trump, he wasn t a candidate anymore. he says he was just acting as president to root out so-called voter fraud, so presidential immunity should protect him from any criminal charges. but, here is what he tweeted just a few weeks after the election. quote, 2020 is a long way from over, that was november 25th of that year, when he was doing everything he possibly could to stay in power. ....
Especially one that did the job i did. i did a great job, and i wasn t working for myself. i was working for the country. i wasn t campaigning, the election was long over. i wasn t campaigning. i was looking for a voter fraud. something that i have to do under my mandate. i have to look for voter fraud. did you catch it? subtle. barely half a sentence but a supremely important point, nonetheless. now at the very heart of donald trump s presidential immunity appeal. a decision we could get conceivably at any time. that was the disgraced ex-president in a message posted to social media this week declaring in no uncertain terms when he pressured mike pence along with a number of state officials to overturn the results of the 2020 election, the ele was long over in fact, political identified six separate occasionsus in the past two weeks where trump that very claim. the implication being he was ....
of course, i was entitled as president of the united states and commander-in-chief to immunity. i m entitle theed to immunity. i wasn t campaigning. i was looking for a voter fraud. something that i have to do under my mandate. i have to look for voter fraud. jack smith is warning that it threatens to license presidents to commit crimes to remain in office. last month the supreme court declined the request tos fast track the case, but the three-judge appeals panel today could set the stage for further appeals to still make their way to the justices. so let s bring in legal analyst and criminal defense attorney joey jackson. good to see you. thank you for being up with us. for start rs, what argument dots you expect to hear today?ers, ws you expect to hear today? i think the arguments will be as follows. you heard some of them there. first, starting with president trump. as president of the united ....
any moment now donald trump will be arriving at the courthouse where a three judge panel will hear arguments, can the former president be held criminally responsible for his efforts to overturn his 2020 loss or does he have immunity from prosecution. this is special coverage, i m layer ar laura coates. and i m kaitlan collins. this could ultimately change the landscape of what presidents are allowed do. trump is foregoing the campaign trail to be at these oral arguments as he claim that s has absolute immunity, that his actions constitute official acts that he took while in office. of course i was entitled as president of the united states and commander in chief to immunity. i m entitled to immunity. every president has immunity. especially one that did the job i did. i did a great job. and i wasn t working for myself, i was working for the country. i wasn t campaigning. election was long over. ....
Wasn t campaigning. i was looking for voter fraud, something that i have to do under my mandate. that argument has already been rejected by the district judge in this federal election subversion case against donald trump. jack smith warned that trump s assertion threatens the license to presidents to commit crimes to remain in office. and we have a lot going on this morning sf morning. and we ll talk to the great panel. it is important to take a step back. of course we have elie honig, and also our january 6 committee lawyer. and glad that you are both here. take a step back for a second hoe. because when people hear court, they think either trial and law & order or they think the supreme court. this is neither of those moments. this is very specific. what do we expect big picture about why we re here? always good to orient ....