Live Breaking News & Updates on Wasnt Classified Information
Stay updated with breaking news from Wasnt classified information. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Suggests others were well aware of it. and this whistleblower account and the one we read today, there were 12 people in the room during the call with zelensky, who were aware of what the president had said and the question that gloria raised, how many other conversations with world leaders have been put in the, quote, lockdown vessel as well? and set aside in these circumstances? it does raise the national security concern. and i think it goes back to continuity and how unstable this administration has been. maguire is a career civil servant, a patriot. no doubt about that. look what he walked into. this is the downside of having constantly acting heads, specifically the dni. situations and questions he wasn t able to answer. not because it wasn t classified information but he wasn t aware. he didn t know rudy giuliani was sent over to speak with ukrainians for certain instances. he didn t know if he had ....
A source close to the president told me he appears to be lacking in folk sbus more distracted as he becomes more consumed by the whistleblower complaint. up against a mounting crisis for his administration, president trump is throwing punches in almost every direction, taking aim at democrats running the whistleblower hearing up on capitol hill. just watched a little bit of this on television. it s a disgrace to our country. it s another witch hunt. here we go again. and i have to put up with adam schiff on an absolutely perfect phone call. reporter: the president is also sounding like he wants vengeance, lashing out at a private breakfast, demanding to know who tipped off the whistleblower, saying that president trump asked for president zelensky s help in the 2020 election. who gave the whistleblower the information? that s close to a spy. do you know what we used to do in the old days when we were ....
Administration on a number of security issues. he has access to a lot of classified information. she says there wasn t classified information on there, but we don t know yet. and there will be more investigating into that. finding out whether there s one or two or duplicates of classified information is relevant to this election, scott. and when it comes to use of private e-mail in anyway shape or form. ivanka trump is a smart person. and she like the rest of us heard this. she deleted the e-mails, she has to go to jail. scott? the she by the way is not ivanka, just to be clear, in case there s confusion. it s obviously not a great story and headline for the white house, the core question is, how do you move forward from an issue like this, what they have to show is transparency, they had to show involvement from the white house council here, what i found interesting is that her private lawyers were answering ....
Rekeying is disclosing a confidential conversation, which is exactly what he did. shannon: john, what do you make of this? the inspector general is looking into the use of those mamas and how they were handled. i think unfortunately mr. comey out to be. i think we are seeing mr. comey thinks he lives by one set of rules and those rules are not the same that apply to the rest of us as americans or even apply to the agents in the fbi. he did like information. the only question is whether it was classified. it s already privileged. he s leaking confidential conversations between the fbi director and the president to the media without the president to president permission. this has done great damage to the fbi, both internally and externally. what president in the future is ever going to trust another fbi director that he can discuss confidential matters with? what fbi agents will trust their leadership to understand that they live by the same rules they hold their agents to enter they ....
Little boy. a lot of people are asking questions about why they won t just let him go. an interesting piece says what i think a lot of people are wondering, the only reason that they would refuse to let them go is because they are terrified that he really might be successfully treated. if they are wrong on a question of life and death, it is being scrutinized internationally. no one would ever trust an nhs end-of-life assessment again. letting him go would require the british health care and judicial systems through the one thing bureaucracies bristles are doing, knowing how it undermines their institutional authorities, they would have to admit they were wrong. they can t do it, to preserve the public s trust, the child must starve. pretty harsh. it s awful. i would say it s deserved, as you mentioned, the the doctorst the british hospital have not been able to diagnose his problem. they are saying he certainly doomed but they don t understand what is happened. as you have pointed ....