Page 13 - What Smith News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

While the case was brought, remember, in the miami federal district court, after all, so it makes a lot of sense. but a liberal d.c. grand jury is what smith, mr. unassailable prefers. now, of course, the get trump media, which has already tried to discredit judge cannon went bonkers. >> judge cannon is going to make the prosecutors work for every single thing they want to do in this case. >> classified documents case we have a judge who may be a bit of a loose cannon in terms of what the rulings will be, no pun intended. if she persists in refusing to let them make their case, then they likel...

>> laura: oh, that commitment? well, there's more we need to know with mr. smith's supposedly unbiased nature. the "wall street journal's" reporting that attorneys who know smith have said that he would feel like he failed if he didn't find charges to bring against a target. now, what does that tell us? attorney general merrick garland knew that he could count on smith to deliver the outcome that he wanted, when he named him the special prosecutor. and let's not forget, this from the "new york times" last year, biden has said privately that he wanted mr. garland to act less like a ponderous ju...

WASHINGTON — In the long annals of the republic, the White House has seen its share of perfidy and scandal, presidents who cheated on their wives and cheated the taxpayers, who abused their power and abused the public trust. But not since the framers emerged from Independence Hall on that clear, cool day in Philadelphia 236 years ago has any president who was voted out of office been accused of plotting to hold onto power in an elaborate scheme of deception and intimidation that would lead to vi

Us. >> joe, you set it up very well. what's so remarkable about this indictment is it starts off, as you said, with jack smith acknowledging that donald trump not only had the right to claim fraud and the election, he had the right to lie about it. the first amendment right to lie. but not to launch a campaign of what smith called pervasive and destabilizing lies and then act on it. that crossed the line into criminal conspiracy, and the indictment charges three separate conspiracies, conspiracy to defraud the united states, conspiracy to obstruct that official proceeding on january 6 and cons...

Why we do is figure take care of it or the political system will. >> we don't criminalize them. ands that what this indictment attempts to with with the incrime. stuff, this is stuff that prosecutors are not supposed to do. if you have got evidence that trump committed incitement. then charge him with incitement. of course i can say as somebody who actually successfully prosecuted a seditious conspiracy case they don't have a prayer of a creates like that for precisely the reasons that jonathan was laying out. so what do you do? you are supposed to put it aside and plead what you can that actu...