8 Problems With San Jose's Gun Insurance Mandate, Ownership Tax
A California city imposes unnecessary burdens on lawful gun owners that won't save taxpayers a single dollar, much less save a single life.
Stay updated with breaking news from Wont Save. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
A California city imposes unnecessary burdens on lawful gun owners that won't save taxpayers a single dollar, much less save a single life.
Lawful gun ownership in San Jose, California, is about to become more expensive and onerous after the City Council passed a measure imposing two unprecedented burdens on the possession of firearms inside city limits.
Authors include Apple veteran Tony Fadell, left-wing podcaster Paris Marx, and acclaimed journalist Johann Hari.
~ Today's Water Cooler ~
Going to work. one reason why, the plaintiffs are pretending it's one election but it's not. it's two separate elections. the first election is just a simple up or down question. do we keep newsom? if enough people say no, let's fire newsom, then you have a separate election. that separate election, newsom is disqualified from running. there's a vacancy in the governorship. it's almost kind of like what would happen if there was a federal impeachment of a president. in that second election, yes, then you vote separately. there is no violation of equal protection because everyone's vote is the ...