Live Breaking News & Updates on Zero theorem

Stay informed with the latest breaking news from Zero theorem on our comprehensive webpage. Get up-to-the-minute updates on local events, politics, business, entertainment, and more. Our dedicated team of journalists delivers timely and reliable news, ensuring you're always in the know. Discover firsthand accounts, expert analysis, and exclusive interviews, all in one convenient destination. Don't miss a beat — visit our webpage for real-time breaking news in Zero theorem and stay connected to the pulse of your community

Oleksandr Zinchenko

..they can be in prison, you know, for that. and the question is just for the population, do they really like to live in these kind of conditions, in the rules where you don't have any... ..you don't have free word? so... but the thing is, since the invasion, this circle became to zero, so i don't speak... i don't speak with anyone there at the moment. that's a regret, surely, that, you know, this is what war causes, that you have presumably people that were your friends that you just can't speak to anymore? well, like i said, i can't blame them. but in the same time, like... ..i think the russian population could do much, much more and a lot of different good things, because they used to call us brothers, sisters, i don't know, whatever. but since this invasion, this time showed us, to all the ukrainians that we can't be friends

Question , Kind , Word , Rules , Population , Prison , Conditions , Invasion , Thing , Circle , Regret , Anyone

Breakfast

Breakfast
vimarsana.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from vimarsana.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.

100000 , 2-5 , Ten , Zero ,

BBC News

the energy security and net zero secretary claire coutinho has been speaking on the bbc�*s laura kuenssberg on sunday this morning. with me is our political correspondent, damian grammaticas. let's start off with climate change. this is the talking point first for the energy secretary. this is the first time she has done a big interview like this on the sunday talk shows for the bbc. the question being put to her was that we saw yesterday, this morning chris stark, so he is the head of the climate change committee and leaving hisjob at the end of this week. as he is leaving he has made some real criticism, pointedly of the prime minister, rishi sunak, who has pushed back interim targets for the climate change transition on transition to diesel and petrol cars, gas boilers in homes and that sort of thing and he said in that that he said rishi sunak was not such a priority for previous prime

Claire-i-coutinho , Bbc-news , Damian-grammaticas , Laura-kuenssberg , Energy-security , Climate-change , Zero , Time , Question , Energy-secretary , Talking-point , Talk-shows

Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg

stuff 13 years ago we would have been far ahead when it comes to renewables which are much cheaper than oil and gas and more resilient when it comes to pricing.— than oil and gas and more resilient when it comes to pricing. luke, what ou make when it comes to pricing. luke, what you make of — when it comes to pricing. luke, what you make of that? _ when it comes to pricing. luke, what you make of that? renewables i when it comes to pricing. luke, what you make of that? renewables like l you make of that? renewables like solar and wind _ you make of that? renewables like solar and wind are _ you make of that? renewables like solar and wind are a _ you make of that? renewables like solar and wind are a total - you make of that? renewables like solar and wind are a total of - you make of that? renewables like solar and wind are a total of 396 i you make of that? renewables like solar and wind are a total of 396 of| solar and wind are a total of 3% of the worldenergy _ solar and wind are a total of 3% of the worldenergy output. - solar and wind are a total of 3% of the worldenergy output. certainly| solar and wind are a total of 3% of. the worldenergy output. certainly in our lifetimes — the worldenergy output. certainly in our lifetimes we _ the worldenergy output. certainly in our lifetimes we will— the worldenergy output. certainly in our lifetimes we will continue - the worldenergy output. certainly in our lifetimes we will continue to i our lifetimes we will continue to rely very— our lifetimes we will continue to rely very heavily _ our lifetimes we will continue to rely very heavily on _ our lifetimes we will continue to i rely very heavily on hydrocarbons. energy— rely very heavily on hydrocarbons. energy costs — rely very heavily on hydrocarbons. energy costs in _ rely very heavily on hydrocarbons. energy costs in china _ rely very heavily on hydrocarbons. energy costs in china are - rely very heavily on hydrocarbons. energy costs in china are a - rely very heavily on hydrocarbons. energy costs in china are a fifth i rely very heavily on hydrocarbons. energy costs in china are a fifth of what _ energy costs in china are a fifth of what they— energy costs in china are a fifth of what they are _ energy costs in china are a fifth of what they are here, _ energy costs in china are a fifth of what they are here, half— energy costs in china are a fifth of what they are here, half of- energy costs in china are a fifth of what they are here, half of what i what they are here, half of what they are — what they are here, half of what they are here _ what they are here, half of what they are here in— what they are here, half of what they are here in america. - what they are here, half of what they are here in america. we i what they are here, half of whati they are here in america. we pay higher— they are here in america. we pay higher energy— they are here in america. we pay higher energy costs— they are here in america. we pay higher energy costs than - they are here in america. we pay higher energy costs than virtually any other— higher energy costs than virtually any other country. _ higher energy costs than virtually any other country. if— higher energy costs than virtually any other country. if we - higher energy costs than virtually any other country. if we want i higher energy costs than virtually any other country. if we want to i any other country. if we want to deindustrialisation_ any other country. if we want to deindustrialisation and - any other country. if we want to deindustrialisation and never. any other country. if we want to deindustrialisation and never do any other country. if we want to i deindustrialisation and never do any more _ deindustrialisation and never do any more manufacturing _ deindustrialisation and never do any more manufacturing and _ deindustrialisation and never do any more manufacturing and cease i deindustrialisation and never do any more manufacturing and cease all. more manufacturing and cease all energy— more manufacturing and cease all energy intensive _ more manufacturing and cease all energy intensive activities - more manufacturing and cease all energy intensive activities in - more manufacturing and cease all energy intensive activities in thisl energy intensive activities in this country. — energy intensive activities in this country. net _ energy intensive activities in this country, net zero _ energy intensive activities in this country, net zero is _ energy intensive activities in this country, net zero is the - energy intensive activities in this country, net zero is the answer. i energy intensive activities in this i country, net zero is the answer. but the fact— country, net zero is the answer. but the fact of— country, net zero is the answer. but the fact of the — country, net zero is the answer. but the fact of the matter _ country, net zero is the answer. but the fact of the matter is _ country, net zero is the answer. but the fact of the matter is we - country, net zero is the answer. but the fact of the matter is we are - the fact of the matter is we are very— the fact of the matter is we are very heavily _ the fact of the matter is we are very heavily and _ the fact of the matter is we are very heavily and increasingly i very heavily and increasingly dependent _ very heavily and increasingly dependent on _ very heavily and increasingly dependent on imports - very heavily and increasingly dependent on imports from i very heavily and increasingly - dependent on imports from places like chine — dependent on imports from places like china. china _ dependent on imports from places like china. china is— dependent on imports from places like china. china is building - dependent on imports from places like china. china is building the i like china. china is building the equivalent— like china. china is building the equivalent of— like china. china is building the equivalent of one _ like china. china is building the equivalent of one coal—fired - like china. china is building the i equivalent of one coal—fired power station _ equivalent of one coal—fired power station every — equivalent of one coal—fired power station every two _ equivalent of one coal—fired power station every two weeks. - equivalent of one coal—fired power station every two weeks. buil-

Thatjust-stop-oil , Gas , Stuff , Wind , Pricing , Total , Renewables , Luke , Oil , Worldenergy-solar , What-ou , 396

Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg

overshoot. but we must understand, lower, there are two things when it comes to this agenda. we want to make sure we future proof industry and we get the benefits into the economy of pushing forward on net zero but we want to protect households and i think people care about climate change and so do i. what they don't want is heaps of costs on them when they see 1% of global emissions and other countries are polluting more. they want us to take a balanced approach. the difficulty for — take a balanced approach. the difficulty for anyone in government as politicians here voted to make it the law you hit these targets and you've mentioned one target. but in the big picture the next big target is to cut emissions in 2030 by 60 8%. just this week the scottish government ditched its target for 2030 so can you categorically say you will keep that target, the 2030? we are not moving away from the

Things , Net-zero , Economy , Agenda , Industry , Overshoot , Benefits , Lower , Proof , Zero , Two , Climate-change

Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg

20 largest economies to have parked our emissions and we've done that in a sensible and pragmatic way and we want to keep doing that and we've seen the economy grow by 80% and we've been protecting household finances. , ., , finances. deborah says the conservatives _ finances. deborah says the conservatives and - finances. deborah says the conservatives and labour. finances. deborah says the - conservatives and labour need to commit to a net zero, it's far too important not to. david says we cannot rely on renewables solely, the sun does not always shine on the wind does not always blow. let's have a final word with the panel. the investigations into mps. layla moran, there is a story about one of your colleagues paying thousands of pounds to party officials to do work on her behalf in the constituency stop do you think yours are entitled to look at what happens and think who are these people? irate what happens and think who are these --eole? ~ . what happens and think who are these neale? . ., what happens and think who are these --eole?~ . ,. , what happens and think who are these n-eole?. ., ,. , , people? we all welcome scrutiny but are colleagues _

80 , 20 , Zero , One ,

Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg

we need to see stronger policy in other areas despite the fact other parts of the world are playing catch—up with you kate. the risk of uk we will lose the race just at the point when you want to be at the head of that. the point when you want to be at the head of that-— point when you want to be at the head of that. the premise ditched some of the _ head of that. the premise ditched some of the measures _ head of that. the premise ditched some of the measures and - head of that. the premise ditched some of the measures and slow. head of that. the premise ditched - some of the measures and slow down what you have been talking about in the autumn. what was your honest reaction? it the autumn. what was your honest reaction? ., , , , the autumn. what was your honest reaction? . , , , ., reaction? it was presented to the count is reaction? it was presented to the country is a _ reaction? it was presented to the country is a step _ reaction? it was presented to the country is a step back _ reaction? it was presented to the country is a step back from - reaction? it was presented to the country is a step back from going| country is a step back from going too fast on this transition and in the speech itself he talked about the speech itself he talked about the need to reappraise lots of the steps that take us to net zero. my honest answer to that is it set us back. i think we have moved from a position where we were really at the forefront pushing ahead as quickly as we could on something i believed to be fundamental to the uk economy, beneficial to the people living in this country, whether you care about the planet were not and we are now in a position where we are trying to recover ground and one example of that, the diplomatic impact of that

Point , Policy , Fact , World , Head , Race , Premise , Parts , Measures , Areas , Risk , British

Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg

more ambitious path than what we had advised. that is fine stop i love ambition. it it only matters if you actually deliver against that. what we have seen in this week is a desperately disappointing thing from the scots. we have pulled away the target framework. almost in its entirety. leaving the net zero target but removing the targets for 2030 and 2040. the reason they have done it is because 2030 target was overambitious. 50 done it is because 2030 target was overambitious.— overambitious. so for political reasons they _ overambitious. so for political reasons they set _ overambitious. so for political reasons they set a _ overambitious. so for political reasons they set a target - overambitious. so for political reasons they set a target theyj overambitious. so for political - reasons they set a target they were never going to hit but now they have had to ditch it.— had to ditch it. yeah. i think this is the problem. _ had to ditch it. yeah. i think this is the problem. politics - had to ditch it. yeah. i think this is the problem. politics and - is the problem. politics and political ambitions is exactly what we need and climate change but that was a bridge too far. there wasn't a credible path to that target. we were the first to say that and we gave them advice on the sort of steps you would need to take to hit that target but they weren't politically palatable. the that target but they weren't politically palatable. the cost to business are _ politically palatable. the cost to business are potentially - politically palatable. the cost to | business are potentially massive, the cost to consumers are personally massive to many people if they look

Thing , Path , It , Stop , Ambition , Scots , Theyj-overambitious , Targets , Reasons , Reason , Target-overambitious , Overambitious

Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg

ieiter— constituents. i have brought a letter here from seven—year—old bella _ letter here from seven—year—old bella has — letter here from seven—year—old bella has written in and they get hundreds— bella has written in and they get hundreds of these to tell me how important — hundreds of these to tell me how important climate changes. they and the youngest constituents are asking is the _ the youngest constituents are asking is the most, they haven't forgotten, and i_ is the most, they haven't forgotten, and i completely agree that we do need _ and i completely agree that we do need to— and i completely agree that we do need to focus on it but it would help— need to focus on it but it would help to — need to focus on it but it would help to have some government stability — help to have some government stabili . �* ., help to have some government stabili . �* . , stability. but there are big long-term _ stability. but there are big long-term targets, - stability. but there are big long-term targets, look, l stability. but there are big - long-term targets, look, aren't long—term targets, look, aren't there, and there is a lot of pressure on industry and consumers to come up with cash to help april of this. iiii to come up with cash to help april of this. , ., to come up with cash to help april of this. ,, ., ., ~' to come up with cash to help april of this. . to come up with cash to help april of this. i. . , , , ., of this. if you look at surveys of what ordinary — of this. if you look at surveys of what ordinary people _ of this. if you look at surveys of what ordinary people care - of this. if you look at surveys of| what ordinary people care about of this. if you look at surveys of i what ordinary people care about it is the _ what ordinary people care about it is the nhs, — what ordinary people care about it is the nhs, the _ what ordinary people care about it is the nhs, the economy, - is the nhs, the economy, immigration, _ is the nhs, the economy, immigration, climate - is the nhs, the economy, i immigration, climate change is the nhs, the economy, - immigration, climate change is is the nhs, the economy, _ immigration, climate change is about 20th on— immigration, climate change is about 20th on their — immigration, climate change is about 20th on their list _ immigration, climate change is about 20th on their list of _ immigration, climate change is about 20th on their list of priorities - 20th on their list of priorities like some _ 20th on their list of priorities like some polling _ 20th on their list of priorities like some polling tends - 20th on their list of priorities like some polling tends to i 20th on their list of prioritiesl like some polling tends to put 20th on their list of priorities i like some polling tends to put it 20th on their list of priorities - like some polling tends to put it in the top _ like some polling tends to put it in the top five — like some polling tends to put it in the top five it _ like some polling tends to put it in the top five. it is— like some polling tends to put it in the top five. it is not— like some polling tends to put it in the top five. it is not the _ like some polling tends to put it in the top five. it is not the number. the top five. it is not the number one but— the top five. it is not the number one but you _ the top five. it is not the number one but you believe _ the top five. it is not the number one but you believe it— the top five. it is not the number one but you believe it that - the top five. it is not the numberi one but you believe it that people are being — one but you believe it that people are being told _ one but you believe it that people are being told what _ one but you believe it that people are being told what to _ one but you believe it that people are being told what to do - one but you believe it that people are being told what to do and - one but you believe it that people are being told what to do and you i are being told what to do and you don't _ are being told what to do and you don't like — are being told what to do and you don't like it? _ are being told what to do and you don't like it? |_ are being told what to do and you don't like it? ithink— are being told what to do and you don't like it? ithink it— are being told what to do and you don't like it? i think it is- are being told what to do and you don't like it? i think it is the - don't like it? i think it is the reality— don't like it? i think it is the reality of— don't like it? i think it is the reality of the _ don't like it? i think it is the reality of the cost _ don't like it? i think it is the reality of the cost of- don't like it? i think it is the reality of the cost of net - don't like it? i think it is the| reality of the cost of net zero don't like it? i think it is the - reality of the cost of net zero and people _ reality of the cost of net zero and people are — reality of the cost of net zero and people are waking _ reality of the cost of net zero and people are waking up _ reality of the cost of net zero and people are waking up to- reality of the cost of net zero and people are waking up to the - reality of the cost of net zero and people are waking up to the factl people are waking up to the fact that when— people are waking up to the fact that when they _ people are waking up to the fact that when they get _ people are waking up to the fact that when they get their- people are waking up to the fact . that when they get their electricity and gas _ that when they get their electricity and gas lpills— that when they get their electricity and gas bills this _ that when they get their electricity and gas bills this is _ that when they get their electricity and gas bills this is going - that when they get their electricity and gas bills this is going to - that when they get their electricity and gas bills this is going to be - and gas bills this is going to be unaffordable. _

Constituents , Most , Hundreds , Letter , Haven-t , Climate-changes , Ieiter-constituents , Old-bella , Bella , Hundreds-bella-has , Seven , Scottish-government

Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg

and gas bills this is going to be unaffordable.— unaffordable. certainly for businesses _ unaffordable. certainly for businesses it _ unaffordable. certainly for businesses it is _ unaffordable. certainly for businesses it is a - unaffordable. certainly for businesses it is a big - unaffordable. certainly for businesses it is a big cost| unaffordable. certainly for - businesses it is a big cost coming down the track so we will raise all theseissues down the track so we will raise all these issues with continue in a few minutes, the energy and net zero secretary but first we will hear from someone else whose subject this is. now most of our politicians are fond of telling us how important it is to tackle climate change. last year was the hottest on record globally, here we're becoming used to seeing wilder weather battering our own shores. british holidaymakers even got stranded by floods in the desert city of dubai just this week. but in the last few six months, well, politicians they've gone a bit wobbly on their own promises. on thursday, the snp ditched its 2030 emissions goal. labour has also ditched its pledge to invest £28 billion each year on green energy. and the prime minister's big pitch to you in the autumn was to delay some of the government's plans to go green. here's the rub. it is the law, that the uk has to hit its net zero target by 2050 — in other words, to remove as much carbon from the air

Gas , Businesses , The-cost-of-living , Thisl-energy , Issues , Someone , Track , Secretary , Big-unaffordable , Subject , Theseissues , Unaffordable