Live Breaking News & Updates on தளவாடங்கள் அமைப்புகள்

Stay updated with breaking news from தளவாடங்கள் அமைப்புகள். Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Voids No-Hire Provision In Service Contract Between Two Employers - Employment and HR


To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
Q: I heard that companies entering into commercial contracts in
Pennsylvania can no longer restrict each other from hiring their
employees. Is that true?
A: On April 29, the Supreme Court of
Pennsylvania held in
Pittsburgh Logistics Systems,
Inc. v. Beemac Trucking LLC, et. al. that a no-hire
provision (commonly referred to as a “no-poach”
provision) in a service contract between two business entities was
unenforceable as an impermissible restraint of trade because it was
overbroad and created a likelihood of harm to nonparties to the ....

United States , Pittsburgh Logistics Systems Inc , Supreme Court , Beemac Trucking , Pittsburgh Logistics Systems , Logistics Systems , Pennsylvania Supreme Court Voids No Hire Provision In Service Contract Between Two Employers , Employment And Hr , Employee Benefits Amp Compensation , Employee Rights Labour Relations , ஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில் , பிட்ஸ்பர்க் தளவாடங்கள் அமைப்புகள் இன்க் , உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் , பிட்ஸ்பர்க் தளவாடங்கள் அமைப்புகள் , தளவாடங்கள் அமைப்புகள் , வேலைவாய்ப்பு மற்றும் மணி , ஊழியர் நன்மைகள் ஆம்ப் இழப்பீடு , ஊழியர் உரிமைகள் தொழிலாளர் உறவுகள் ,

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Voids No-Hire Provision in Service Contract Between Two Employers | Troutman Pepper


To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog:
Q: I heard that companies entering into commercial contracts in Pennsylvania can no longer restrict each other from hiring their employees. Is that true?
A: On April 29, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania held in
Pittsburgh Logistics Systems, Inc. v. Beemac Trucking LLC, et. al. that a no-hire provision (commonly referred to as a “no-poach” provision) in a service contract between two business entities was unenforceable as an impermissible restraint of trade because it was overbroad and created a likelihood of harm to nonparties to the contract (
i.e., affected employees and the general public). This decision comes at a time where there has been considerable concern that no-poach agreements violate federal and state antitrust laws. In this case, however, the Court did not conclude that all no-hire provisions found in commercial contracts are void as a matter of state law. ....

United States , Pittsburgh Logistics Systems Inc , Supreme Court , Beemac Trucking , Logistics Systems , ஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில் , பிட்ஸ்பர்க் தளவாடங்கள் அமைப்புகள் இன்க் , உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் , தளவாடங்கள் அமைப்புகள் ,