either they're watching and they don't want their adversesaries to know they're watching, or they're not watching and they don't want them to know there's gaps and wholes in the surve surveillan surveillance. in some of these countries, take pakistan, the military is its own entity, it calls the shots, and the government is not in a position to force them to turn it over when they're sort of in charge. other countries may have secrecy laws and there's a whole separate thing here where malaysia has never handled this sort of thing before. this is all first time for them. it's the first time for a lot of these countries. so there isn't a history, aren't protocols, isn't any practice. people are having to create this for the first time and governments tend to be slow movers. they don't tend to be nimble and quick in trying to share information like this. >> you know, i appreciate all that, but there doesn't have to be a protocol for humanity, does there? >> i hear what you're saying. this would be true for the united states as well, i would say. before we handed over a bunch of sensitive military data, we