big deal. the issue at hand is not so much whether a president can be subpoenaed although that's relevant but whether the president must comply with a subpoena if he gets one. this is an important question which analysis from the "new york times" highlights. above the fold smack on a 1 of today's newspaper reads the headline why talking with mueller is a minefield. the analysis there says the list of questions reportedly compiled by jump's lawyer jay sekulow on what mueller would ask shows why his lawyers think an interview with the special counsel would be dangerous for trump. to talk about this, daniel goldman, danny is a vallos author of the piece i just told you about in the nooim. charlie savage, and jays vance, msnbc could transcriber and former u.s. attorney in alabama.