discussed gun suicide and listed the well-known mass shootings in america like uvalde, buffalo, orlando, dayton, he talked about the horrors of that. justice alito who was in the majority wrote separately in a concurrence, he slapped back at justice breyer saying why does the dissent think it's relevant to recount the mass shootings that have occurred in recent years? does the dissent think laws like new york's prevent or deter such atrocities? if he knows it's illegal to carry a handgun outside a home? how does the senate account for the fact that one of the mass shootings near the top of this list took place in buffalo -- the new york law and issued in this case did not stop that perpetrator. i don't know, that's a heck of a retirement send-off for stephen breyer. another obvious reason that you know the court got it right, reactions from some of the most

Related Keywords

Justice Alito , Majority , Mass Shootings , Horrors , Gun Suicide , Buffalo , Orlando , Dayton , America Like Uvalde , Justice Breyer , Dissent , Shootings , New York , Laws , Concurrence , Prevent , One , Home , List , Fact , Place , Handgun , Account , Atrocities , Top , Senate , Court , Law , Case , Some , Reason , Reactions , Retirement Send Off , Perpetrator , Heck ,