back contributed to his inability to control himself when he was in the back of that van, and that's really what caused this neck injury. ordinary person in ordinary situation would not have had the same problem. i'm not sure it's going to fly. i agree with darren, but i think they'll explore it. >> just to try to create some doubt there. so, darren, what about the medical examiner who performed the autopsy and testified she did not find any signs of a previous back or neck injury? how does that factor in here? >> right. well, ultimately it becomes a tale of two narratives. and the jury is going to be tasked with the ultimate responsibility of deciding which is the more credible, likely version. at the end of the day while i think that the defense will get to fully explore this issue and it would be a mistake not to allow them to, i don't think that this will be the thing that turns the case. but you never know. and that's why as much as pundits like trent and i may like to opine from the sidelines, you got to play the game on the field. and ultimately it's going to be
Related Keywords
Back , Problem , Van , Person , Situation , Neck Injury , Darren Kavanoki , Inability , Injury , Signs , Neck , Examiner , Autopsy , Factor , Doubt , Defense , Issue , Responsibility , Jury , Tale , Version , Narratives , Mistake , Two , Freddie Gray Case , Thing , Trent Copeland , Sidelines , Pundits , The Field , Game ,
vimarsana.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.