not as much time as chairman schiff has put in on this. but put in months of work and we have neither of the two committee chairman who have done all of the work here be forced to answer our questions. i have no doubt that mr. raskin is exasperated because he is an answerer. he's a fact provider. he educated this committee on a regular basis on matters of the law. but it offends my sense of fairness that my ranking member can't have a witness of his choosing. i'm not talking ant 100 witnesses. i'm talking about a witness of his choosing to come. the process gets described over and over again, the white house had plenty of opportunity and everybody had an equal chance to question. nonsense. nonsense. and to let that record stand perpetuates the myth that this is supposed to have been a fair process.