Biggest News aggregator with 200 million news articles | vimarsana.com
altered it. but if it is just something, something popped up or i told my husband not to talk to me about it, but he did how do you how do you then make an assessment of your going to ask the judge? >> it's usually calls him in one-on-one. you go in the backyard, the judge's roving room, everyone's their all their back to participants. and you see it's really about a matter of degree. and then both sides take a position if it was a person in jury selection, you didn't like this is your opportunity to say, judge, you gotta throw them off. and so when you judge wasn't such a big deal, but also the judge might want to err on the side of getting rid of the juror because if you keep the jury are creating a issues and the court depends upon the nature of the violation, and you always get called to the principal's office. that is the judge. and then you explain what goes on. and i think we could expect and anticipate that's why we have alternate things are going to arise. accord offices is going to hear some discussion for the jurors as you noted, or they're not supposed to talk. i heard them speaking together. they would talk about michael coleman. they would talk about salami, dan's issues will arise. it'll be up to the judge to determine whether it reaches the gray to get them off the jury.