anyway. there will be questions as to how she got that role, what the process was, we were putting down questions, asking for all those recruitment details to be published but again, it is the correct thing that she has resigned and she shouldn't have been there. these boards exist _ shouldn't have been there. these boards exist in _ shouldn't have been there. these boards exist in other _ shouldn't have been there. these | boards exist in other departments now, it is an attempt to create an oversight model for the operation of departments, presumably people will now question how other people get on these boards and other departments as well. ~ ., as well. well, indeed, the whole rocess as well. well, indeed, the whole process around _ as well. well, indeed, the whole process around these _ as well. well, indeed, the whole process around these boards - as well. well, indeed, the whole process around these boards has become entirely lacking in transparency and people should be appointed to the source of public roles based on merit. that doesn't seem to happen. it looks like cronies, friends, obviously in this case are very close friend of ministers, get these plum jobs. it stinks, really. it shouldn't be allowed to happen. so, there are questions about the appointment