> well, because they weren't shortfalls they weren't missteps and "> > well, because they weren't shortfalls they weren't missteps and " property="og:description"> > well, because they weren't shortfalls they weren't missteps and ">
to them in the days and weeks after pat's death." mary, why shouldn't that put it away? >> well, because they weren't shortfalls they weren't missteps and they weren't errors. they were deliberate attempts to cover up what happened in order for them to use pat's death for propaganda purposes at a time during the war in 2004 when, you know, abu ghraib prison scandal was breaking, you know, fallujah, you know, was falling apart. i mean, it was a terrible time for the military and for that administration and pat's death was an opportunity for them. in fact there is a line in -- it's in the book. it was in the documents that i -- that we were given. one of the investigative generals asked someone in the chain of command who is clearly, you know, at a higher rank than the investigative officer, because he kept calling him "sir" and the name was redacted but the general said, well, what