after something very hard to see if they can make a case. they ask the justice department to use a grand jury to get evidence. they interview the subject of the investigation at the beginning, not at the end, and they doggedly pursue evidence. here none of those things was tone. >> so you don't think they did their full job at that time, you know, a lot of people defended him at the sometime. obviously now everyone's sides have switched. peter king , republican who supports trump, defended comey back then when donald trump obviously was slamming him every time he got a chance. here's what peter king said about thome. >> i think it's a mistake for republicans to somehow think comey was in on a fix so he was rigging something. he's of unimpeachable integrity. he could have indicted hillary clinton if he wanted to, there was enough evidence there. he made a very good case saying why he didn't. >> i like peter king. peter king is a friend of mine. peter king knows nothing at all about investigating cases. okay? number one, this wasn't comey's