example? >> our argument in front of the court this wednesday is going to be even though you might have neutral language that doesn't mean that, the kousts jurt need to wake up every morning as if it's a brand new day and not look at all the statements that were behind it. what the supreme court has said is that you can actually look behind the statements that were made previously, in order to find the discriminatory intent. and so here what we have is, i think this is really difficult, for the administration, honestly. is that from 2015-2016 and even up until the time that president trump took office. he and his surrogates have referred to this as a muslim ban or worse yet, a muslim ban that they were trying to make look not like a muslim ban. and that's where we are. >> trump himself has seemed to distance himself from the implementation of this new ban. he's been kind of quiet. he's been kind of private on all