as a terrorist group. this is a regime in charge in syria, that's what you would be attacking if you do further military action. that's a meaningful distinction, is it not? >> it's a distinction, but >> we should debate the strategy. do we believe the use of force is warranted and the strategy correct? vote yes. if we don't, vote no. there would be many forms of an authorization that would come to us, but we need a debate, and, chris, minimally, that's what we did yesterday, and i'm very pleased that after so many years and after working with democrats and republicans, it's been 16 years that we were able to finally come to some bipartisan agreement that we should at least repeal the 2001, and come to congress for a debate and a new authorization, if, in fact, that's what the congress insists on. >> and while i have you what do you want people to know about