report to the attorney general, he reports to rosenstein. so does congress say the only reason he's replacing rosenstein to put somebody in place that puts a clamp on the investigation. and anybody watching in washington will say if you take out comi, it is going to get i look at rosenstein issue and say i understand why somebody playi playing checkers would do that, avoiding the near term pain but if you take him out, the second dimension problems are more significant than he thinks. >> let me play devil's advocate, laura, what will congress and sessions do if he fires rosenstein? nothing. >> and that is pretty much why everyone is looking at this and balking, thinking what will the recourse and domino affect of this. and you have to do the equivalent if you were to fire rosenstein and that doesn't bounce back to jeff sessions. it goes to somebody who is now an associate attorney general and then the head of the office of legal counsel. you have to assume if you are --