language not looking him in the eye. he accuse ds of prosecutor of crying at one point. he described himself as seize ner his own roam. has this judge done things that could impact the outcome of the case. >> well judge he willis better keep in mind the way things turned out for caesar. he had a good run but didn't end well. like all federal judges they serve for life. and they are the king in their courtroom. and his reputation is that he always has to be the smartest guy in the room. and more often than not he is. and he puts up with no non-sense from the attorneys. but the real question is, is he interfering with the trial to such a degree that you might have reversible error when it gets taken up to the appellate court. the second thing i would say be careful what you wish for here. because the defense which is probably amused as this pounding