out of this. i was very interested in the speech made by the special envoy at stanford about -- which read between the lines, would seem to indicate a more -- a more flexible stance than we've taken in the past. and i certainly hope, which i know won't happen, that the president afterwards will profoundly overstate the results of the summit. i think it would really be useful if he would take the opportunity to pose the question to kim jong-un what exactly do you need to feel sufficiently secure so you don't need nuclear weapons? and it would be really good thing to have the answer to that question if we're going to lay out, i think, a racial negotiating strategy. >> other than a change in rhetoric, and, you know, going from fire and furry fury to we n