going on and report back to me. i've also known today they're all working behind the scenes and there are some options on the table that they're dealing with to do this path forward. one is an executive order. that's pretty fraught, it would go right to the supreme court and be very legally complicated. i had one government official said at this point that's not realistic. another thing, okay, maybe do an addendum, some kind of supplement after the fact. that's a little troublesome. or maybe go back to the supreme court with some kind of motion to reconsider. basically i talked to somebody who said, you know, it's not unethical or crazy for them to look at this issue a little bit harder. but when you look at the hurdles before them, having to do with deadlines, possible injunctions and everything else, they might at the end of the day come to the conclusion that resources could be better spent. >> because it is in the constitution that the census must go forward every ten years and that deadline is