> bob: they said, "even if it did happen, john probably would not "> > bob: they said, "even if it did happen, john probably would not " property="og:description"> > bob: they said, "even if it did happen, john probably would not ">
hmm. gets re-elected i guess we know who has front row seat with the "washington post." >> bob: they said, "even if it did happen, john probably would not have said anything. if he were alive today he would be furious about the story." they did not refute the story. >> andrea: yes, they did. they said the portrayal is factually incorrect. >> bob: that is the portrayal. >> andrea: angry to use it to political further agenda. >> bob: even if it did happen, john probably would haven't said anything. >> andrea: how does this again help democrats? help, trying to paint obama -- >> bob: it goes to the character of someone who wants to be president. >> greg: this is a story that the media loves and america doesn't care about. >> bob: gay marriage. >> kimberly: the issue of the day. they want to stay on social issues to resonate their base. and manufacturer the ridiculous outrage about a story that is 50 years old. they are missing the point of what americans care about.