attorney's office for southern district of new york, against michael cohen relates to a potential f.e.c., federal lex commission, violation of an illegal campaign fund. at a midnight conversation with rudy juliany, he said to me this takes that off the table. now, can you probably argue legally one way or the other whether it does, in fact, or whether it puts you in more legal jeopardy. one thing that seems to have been illuminated, is i don't know if you want to say a contribution or flat-out untrue statement, back on february 13, michael cohen, when this first became public, said neither the trump organization nor the trump campaign was a party to the transaction with's m clifford, stormy daniels, neither reimbursed me for the payment directly or indirectly. we know that's not the case. maybe it wasn't the campaign that reimbursed him, but cohen did get reimbursed for this whole thing. i want to play one other statement from michael avenati, stormy daniels' lawyer.
Related Keywords
Michael Cohen , Rudy Guiliani , Conversation , Table , Campaign Fund , Violation , Federal Lex Commission , Southern District Of New York , Fec , Thing , Way , Mother , Fact , Statement , Contribution , Flat , Jeopardy , 13 , One , February 13 , Democratic Party , Payment , Stormy Daniels , Public , Trump Campaign , Organization , Transaction , First , Tim Clifford , Doesn T , Makea Vais Case , Campaign , Go Away Michael Avenati ,
vimarsana.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.