>> you mentioned the proposed constitutional amendment that failed bodily on the ballot. i was wonder figure you can take us in the politics of how that went down and people think of michigan as a pro union, pro labor state with a rich history. your colleague wrote something i found interesting. reilly on the free press seemed like a theory of what unions need to do and where they went wrong. she said the 1960s and 1970s were fighting for the phone. they both called and want their culture back. they want their methods of selling the union back. they are calling now and if the unions don't answer that call with new ideas and a new program, america will be a right to work nation by the time hillary rodham clinton completes her second term. i particularly like that last part. what actually happened politically on the ground in the failure of that constitutional amendment. what did the argument look like