would take them and clearly president trump is uncomfortable even though he still has the right to vet them. we have complete vetting. it's not uncolonel taking. it would be vetting. i think it's important here, besides the bilateral relationship. you can't reinvent everything. there has to be a presumption of continuity when you go from one administration to the next. you can actually introduce new policies but you can't undo old ones. i think this would be a terrible way to get started with the australians. we should vet these people if it turns out some are questionable you don't let them in, but i do think this administration can't begin its relationship with one of our closest allies by tearing up this agreement. >> this won't ruin the relationship but what i think is most significant about this is the shock waves it's sending through washington and around the world that this conversation was leaked. the president has to be concerned about that. but for someone to put forward details about this conversation and the other conversation he had with president of mexico, it is a sign of rebellion within much of the establishment that they are not going to let president trump operate his way