defense. at least it doesn't appear so. in florida, every state has a different insanity defense. some states don't even have it anymore. but generally in florida, he had to have not understood the wrongfulness of what he was doing. not that he personally thought he was justified but, rather, he had to be unaware that society deemed what he was doing was wrong. and if he escaped, if he concealled his crime in any way or tried to, that's going to be a very difficult uphill battle. now, some of the efvidence that came out recently about his troubled childhood could become a nonstatutory mitigating factor in a death penalty argument. defense counsel could use that sort of as a bargaining chip and say look if we go to trial, we have some decent arguments, some nonstatutory mitigating factors, given his history. but then the prosecution could always say, yes, we've got some major aggravators, including the fact that he executed,