Biggest News aggregator with 200 million news articles | vimarsana.com
to be particularly specific about it. ., to be particularly specific about it. s, , , ., ., , to be particularly specific about it. .,, s to be particularly specific about it. that is understandable. we have been looking _ it. that is understandable. we have been looking at _ it. that is understandable. we have been looking at the _ it. that is understandable. we have been looking at the numbers, i it. that is understandable. we have been looking at the numbers, the l been looking at the numbers, the estimates at the moment, that it costs around $2.5 billion —— £2.5 billion annually to maintain the status quo, so there is not much more, the government could argue, if there is that slight price increase, if you like, and the other deterrent costs of people saying, maybe we will not make our way to the uk, would it be value for money? there are two things _ would it be value for money? there are two things to _ would it be value for money? there are two things to think _ would it be value for money? there are two things to think about i would it be value for money? tues are two things to think about here, that are worth ensuring we understand. the first is that the cost of the system is extremely high at the moment because we are accommodating large numbers of people. we are accommodating large numbers of people because there has been a dramatic slowdown in the processing of asylum claims. 0nce been a dramatic slowdown in the processing of asylum claims. once an asylum seeker�*s claim has been processed, in theory the uk government can remove that person if they claim fails, or that person will thenjoin society, they claim fails, or that person will then join society, if the claim is successful. and that means that the cost of the asylum system would