Biggest News aggregator with 200 million news articles | vimarsana.com
do you anticipate could happen? >> you know, it's always hard to predict, but i will say because of the underlying alleged misconduct, there may be some interest on the part of hastert's defense attorneys, and certainly the client, to avoid moving forward. obviously, in the event that they did have a trial, the lawyers would be arguing the past misconduct is not relevant to prove the crime charged. however, to the extent that it would attempt to explain why he was doing what he was doing, which, you know, look. the reality is this. it's your money, you can move the money. but if you require taking more than $10,000 out, there are certain reporting requirements that the bank has to engage in. the bigger issue is when he was taking 50 at a clip and the bank said you can't do this in july of 2002 or what are you doing and what is the basis of you doing it and if you do it, we have to report it? then he starts shifting and we know he took out 106 transactions less than $10,000