possible conflicts of interest. so where will this go? joining us is the author of clinton inc. and journalist with the weekly standard, daniel, good to see you. >> you too, eric. >> where there's smoke there's fire we heard josh ernest say there's no evidence of any improper action. >> the clinton house has smoke in it now. we don't have e-mails saying that either hillary clinton or bill clinton would do this for a specific amount of money or something like that. so it's missing that direct evidence but there's enough correlation, and there's enough corresponding information to suggest some sort of impropriety, and of course that's what we're interesting in that's what we're asking questions about. it's incumbent on mrs. clinton and president clinton to speak about it speak to the press about it and take questions because these are serious, and they need to be answered. >> took her a while to have the u.n. security council press