who we both know the former attorney general to ask whether or not even if there had been no videotape whether it would be problematic for a police officer to shoot someone who was cleary running away and he essentially said as a constitutional matter tennessee versus garner, 1985 supreme court case that only circumstance in which a fleeing sarah can be shot if that person clearly posed some violent threat. they were accused of a violent felony. in the case of mr. scott this was a traffic violation. he had nothing in his record that was more serious than failure to pay child support. things like that that were in his record so there was nothing obvious about him that made him an obvious danger to the officer so then you had the officer say he attempted to attack me. i was in fear of my life. even independent of the video you'd have to ask whether a suspect like this person posed enough of a threat clearly