Muddying debate on COVID-19 origin distracts from real resea

Muddying debate on COVID-19 origin distracts from real research


Muddying debate on COVID-19 origin distracts from real research
By ZHANG ZHIHAO |
CHINA DAILY |
Updated: 2021-07-16 06:48
Share
Illustration by Qianli
From genetic signatures to personal testimonies, evidence is growing to support the theory that the COVID-19 virus emerged from nature, while the lab leak hypothesis remains unsubstantiated, according to studies and scientists.
Last week, 21 scientists from universities and research institutes around the world published a critical review on the possible origins of SARS-CoV-2 on the preprint server Zenodo. The paper, which is still awaiting peer review, examined existing scientific literature on the two hypotheses.
Citing the history of emerging diseases, epidemiological data and genomic information, it concluded that a substantial body of scientific evidence points to a zoonotic origin of the virus, while there is currently no credible evidence of a lab leak. The Wuhan Institute of Virology in Hubei province has been put forward by some scientists and Western governments as a possible source of the coronavirus.

Related Keywords

Beijing , China , Australia , United States , Qian Li , Guangdong , Singapore , Yi Gang , Gansu , Hubei , Wuhan , Australian , Chinese , David Relman , Danielle Anderson , Bloomberg , University Of Chemical Technology , Stanford University , Wuhan Institute Of Virology , College Of Life Science , Wuhan Institute , Life Science , Beijing University , Chemical Technology , பெய்ஜிங் , சீனா , ஆஸ்திரேலியா , ஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில் , குவாங்டாங் , சிங்கப்பூர் , இ கும்பல் , க்யாந்ஸ்யூ , ஆஸ்திரேலிய , சீன , டேனியல் ஆண்டர்சன் , ப்ளூம்பெர்க் , பல்கலைக்கழகம் ஆஃப் இரசாயன தொழில்நுட்பம் , ஸ்டான்போர்ட் பல்கலைக்கழகம் , கல்லூரி ஆஃப் வாழ்க்கை அறிவியல் , வாழ்க்கை அறிவியல் , பெய்ஜிங் பல்கலைக்கழகம் , இரசாயன தொழில்நுட்பம் ,

© 2025 Vimarsana