we can now speak to neama rahmani, who's a former federal prosecutor and currently president of west coast trial lawyers. thank you forjoining us. talk us through the mechanics of this case, what is being argued?— this case, what is being arrued? i. .,, , argued? everyone has been talkin: argued? everyone has been talking about _ argued? everyone has been talking about this _ argued? everyone has been talking about this divorce i argued? everyone has been. talking about this divorce but this is not a family law case, this is not a family law case, this is not a family law case, this is a partnership dispute or breach of contract case between business partners. they own the winery, before they were married, during their marriage and they still own it together so now they are trying together so now they are trying to split up this partnership, unfortunately, we are seeing litigation. unfortunately, we are seeing litiuation. ., unfortunately, we are seeing litigation-— litigation. you say this is not a divorce _ litigation. you say this is not a divorce but _ litigation. you say this is not a divorce but a _ litigation. you say this is not a divorce but a contract - litigation. you say this is not| a divorce but a contract case, that suggest there is a contract, this is pretty simple and straightforward? you would think there _ and straightforward? you would think there would _ and straightforward? you would think there would be _ and straightforward? you would think there would be a - and straightforward? you would think there would be a written l think there would be a written contract because under california law, if there is a written contract, one would have to be attached to the