johnson is trying to play on the idea that nobody knows what he was actually thinking. the classic, it�*s not a legal case but a lot of cases you have to prove did the person do something with intent. he is trying to keep that focus on this case to say, you cannot prove that i knew what was going on and i chose to do something either through recklessness or will, i decided to do something wrong. that kind of seed of doubt, he wants to spread that seed of doubt in the minds of the committee members so they feel less and less sure that they can make thatjudgment. he definitely thought something that only he knows, whether he knew it was wrongdoing or not.— wrongdoing or not. emilo casalicchio, _ wrongdoing or not. emilo casalicchio, we _ wrongdoing or not. emilo casalicchio, we will- wrongdoing or not. emilo casalicchio, we will leave j wrongdoing or not. emilo i casalicchio, we will leave you to it. we�*re looking forward to how you wrap this up, editor of politicals london pm playbook. thank you. now to new york, where the united nations is warning of an approaching global water