control incurring more damage? andrew mccabe, jim baker join us now. thank you, fellas. jim baker, legal significance of the admission, assuming it stands as fact, that it was about the dnc server, that was the quid pro quo. >> it's further evidence of the president's violation in my opinion of his constitutional responsibilities and he just didn't do what he was supposed to do. he is not living up to his oath of office because he is abusing his constitutional power to try to stay in office. and the evidence that he -- >> i hear that on biden, that's a clear case. but why couldn't they argue on this one? this is why i liked the argument when rudy first made it a few weeks ago. i know andrew doesn't like the argument but i got to make it. which is, corruption is legit. you care about 2016 interference. i know a lot of people think it's a conspiracy theory. i don't. so i want them to look into it because i think they were out to