what if he didn't have that answer at his disposal? >> there's three -- exactly. you're right on that. there's three things that i'm looking at. who was he working for? was he working for the president, for the state department as he has said in the pass? was he working for lev parnas, for some other person? is he over there working for this television network supposedly doing this documentary? that is very unclear. that then drives the other question that you were just referencing, who's paying for all this? of great concern to me is are any federal funds being spent in support of this travel and, if so, like how is that being approved, how is that being accounted for? and if he's working for the federal government and he's not using federal funds, how is the government accepting his services? that's not consistent with the law either. that doesn't make any sense.