saying he was not allowed to have the gun is not true. read the wisconsin law. you can not like the law, but he was within the rights that the state affords. you can criticize the law. you should. he didn't violate it. it's a more relevant question to ask -- and i know you're not going to like this. but if you want to talk about the law, have you heard anybody ask why the third person he shot, the man with the gun who was chasing him and pointed it at him and came at him, why he escaped all police scrutiny? none of the people who were angry about this verdict see anything curious about that situation. justice is blind, right? so, it should be blind to politics as well, right? again, i'm not happy. there's nothing to be happy about here. today's verdict of not guilty doesn't mean the actions on august 25th for innocent.