i mean, do you see that as a delay in sharing his cause of death? >> no, i think they have to determine that. the problem with the situation when a body has been in a wet environment, especially, for several weeks now possibly five weeks in that one place. the decomposition, alone, could be almost 100% of the -- all the soft tissue. so you may be lift with mostly just a skeleton. now, if he took pills to overdose to kill himself, if he shot himself, if he slit his wrist. if you use one of those forms of killing yourself, there is the possibility that you would see slash marks on the wrist bones or perhaps a bullet hole in the skull. something like that is very evident, very easy to see. but you still have to prove that that was him that did it. and so, there had to be a weapon on scene. the answer we heard from the officer saying i can't get into that about whether or not there was a weapon on scene leads me to believe there might have been. >> as with everything with this, the questions remain and more can be learned. thank you, tim, appreciate it