to this military installation and any military installation. most were based on the reporting, he showed up yesterday, drove up like anybody else would drive up, showed his card, pulled up, walked into the building and was part of a massacre. part of the question is, is security on military installations correct? and the vetting of these government contractors in which here's a seattle police report here. the incident happens, the police take him in but the prosecutor never takes it to the finish line. does that mean he can get access to guns? that's the line. after all these big incidents, there's a lot of warning signs but nobody ever acted. >> here you have a record of arrests, at least two of them and, fran, the military's own records of what his pattern of misconduct was that led to discharge. the question i give over to you is, this is about failed policy, failed practice? how do we explain how somebody with this kind of past gets allowed into the armed services