allegations talked me about that. >> well, yeah. i mean, that's part of that's part of the response that you do you solve from this way where people are like having to put aside their own personal bias. everyone obviously has their biases. and that's one of the things that lawyers bring up too. to some of these jurors and it's not surprising, i guess, because, you know, when you when you walk around new york you know, people, new yorkers are kinda different, you know, and it's not surprising that for example, people who are have views about infidelity or extra-marital affairs are like luck. that's just kinda thing that happens. >> you know, it's interesting in this case. i'm jessica and boris because on the one hand, whether or not there is veracity to the allegations of an affair, might not even have have to go to the heart of what the prosecution has to prove. they have to prove that there was an intent to engage in some kind of fraudulent behavior to falsify business records. and if there was the allegation alone to mock demotivate that, that might be part of it. but