>> protective. >> is this the case? >> well -- >> generally protective when they're acting within the scope of their employment. >> exactly. >> i think in this particular case he was acting outside the scope of his employment, so there's no way that the government's going to pay. >> and he can't make a case for that. and so i think he is trying to figure out how he will settle with them so he doesn't -- you know, if he doesn't have any protections, it's going to come out of his pocket all of the lawsuit settlements or whatever they end up finding that he has to compensate these victims for. it could wipe out his whole retirement with 13, 14 -- who knows how many more. who knows how many more can come out. i think that's what this is all about. >> all right. let's shift gears. let's talk about former congressman jesse jackson jr. this week in court, scheduled sentencing, prosecutors are saying they want four years for his admission of guilt of misuse of campaign funds to the tune of $750,000. that he admitted to this offense. does that offer any leniency as he heads to court for
Related Keywords
Way , Case , Scope , Employment , Government , Protective , Victims , Lawsuit Settlements , Finding , Protections , Pocket , Court , Prosecutors , More , Jesse Jackson Jr , Sentencing , Retirement , Congressman , Lets Shift Gears , 13 , 14 , Campaign Funds , Offense , Misuse , Guilt , Tune , Admission , Leniency , Four , 750000 , 50000 ,
vimarsana.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.