apparently -- just think about just how odd and absurd this is. they're saying the government should have no part in trying to tell you to wear a mask, even though it might negatively impact unvaccinated children. that same argument about the -- whether the government has a right to control your body or your health decisions in some form or fashion, that doesn't apply at all when you're talking about abortion apparently, even though the same logic should apply if you're speaking about concern for presumed children. so this notion here is so inconsistent. and why you also know that this is really not founded in logic. there is as reva so brilliantly said, the wicked brilliance of the litigation strategy, but that is obviously countered by the absurdity of the hypocrisy that's involved here. it should not go unnoticed that remember the supreme court has not as its current composition, has not demonstrated an overwhelming love and appreciation for roe v. wade.