myself have had jury selections that i've taken longer than a week when it's been 200 people that are presented on the panel, which is what was presented here in this case. so the fact that he was able to expedited move it along, i mean, he really has a good knack for that not all judges do by the way. so he's already proven he's keeping it on track. he's probably even ahead of schedule because i'm sure the judge himself probably did not expect to have the jury completely seated with six alternates in the boxes. we call it in one week, so that's that's just for a good he just has to keep everything on track from this point. >> so in the end or it's about to begin and how with 12 jurors, six alternates. but there's been a lot of pressure on these jurors were seeing an already dismissal voluntary, or otherwise have three juror. so do you think having six alternate is going to be enough that is my question as well.