the opening statements, but i do think they will make a big push to get out there counter narrative, which was there was no fraud here. there was no intention to defraud anybody. this was just an agreement between citizen trump and citizen daniels to pay money to suppress a story which was untrue. but damaging. and so there was a calculation made that like with karen mcdougal or others, we would suppress just like bill clinton did with the so-called bimbo eruptions when he was running no harm, no foul, no intend to defraud private case. government prosecuting me because i'm donald trump to interfere with the election. i think that's their narrative. we'll see how much leeway the judge gives them to make it, though. >> okay. and you say opening statements, it could be just an hour, so that means there would be room for witness number one or two with the judge. >> one but things to keep moving in that respect and get